We Have Stopped Reading Long Things, and This Is a Long Thing About It
11 points · November 2026 · 1 response · 75 comments
a note from the writer
Two drafts in, and I still cannot make it short. That is rather the point.
I am going to make an argument that is undermined by its own length, and I am going to make it anyway, because the alternative is to make it short, and short is the problem.
The argument is this. Somewhere in the last fifteen years we stopped reading long things — not stopped being able to, but stopped choosing to, which is worse, because it is a choice that feels like a fact. We say nobody reads long things any more the way we say it rains a lot here. As though the weather did it.
The weather did not do it. We did it, and we did it in a series of small reasonable decisions that added up to an unreasonable one.
Here is how it went, for me. First the newspaper, which I stopped buying because it was all online, and online I read the headlines and the first paragraph, because that is what the page shows you and what the page shows you is what you read. Then magazines, which I stopped subscribing to because I never finished them, and I never finished them because I had stopped buying the newspaper and had lost the habit of sitting with print. Then books, which I did not stop reading but started reading differently — twenty pages, then the phone, then twenty pages — so that a book took a month and a month is long enough to forget the beginning.
Then the phone itself, which is where I read now, and which is very good at short things and very bad at long ones, not because the screen is small but because the phone is a place where something else is always about to happen. You cannot read a long thing in a place where something else is about to happen. You can only read the start of it.
I want to be precise about what was lost, because it is easy to be vague and sound like a person complaining about the young. What was lost is not attention. I have as much attention as I ever had. What was lost is the willingness to give it in advance — to commit an hour to something before knowing whether it would be worth an hour. The short thing lets you decide as you go. The long thing asks you to decide first.
And that asking is the whole value. A long piece of writing is a wager the writer makes on the reader's patience, and a wager the reader makes on the writer's competence, and neither can be settled until the end. The wager is the relationship. When we read only short things, we read only things that have already proved themselves in the first paragraph, which means we read only things that put their best sentence first, which means we read things built like advertisements.
This is not an argument for length as a virtue. Most long things should be shorter. It is an argument for length as a possibility — for keeping open the option that something might need three thousand words and that a reader might give them. Once the option closes, it closes for writers too. Nobody writes what nobody will read. The short thing wins not because it is better but because it is the only thing still being written.
Somebody will point out that I am making this argument on a website, on a screen, to people on their phones. I know. I am also making it at length, on a site that ranks pieces by votes, where a piece this long will be voted on mostly by people who have not finished it. That is the experiment. If you are reading this sentence, the experiment has gone better than the thesis predicts.
I do not have a fix. I have a practice, which is that I read one long thing a week on paper, with the phone in another room, and I do not let myself stop before the end even when the thing is bad, because stopping is the habit I am trying to unlearn and a bad long thing is the best practice for it. I have read some very bad things this way. I have also read the best thing I read last year, which I would have abandoned on page four on a screen, and which did not become good until page forty.
Page forty. That is the number. That is what we have stopped getting to.
If you have got this far: thank you, and I would like to know what page forty of something was for you. Not on the wall — a wall is for short things, and rightly. Write it as a piece. Make it long.
orchard-seed 4 days ago
The piece needs to make its case in the first third. It makes it in the last.
estuary-seed 4 days ago
The final image is beautiful and unrelated to anything before it.
fathom-seed 4 days ago
The dates don't add up. Either the narrator is wrong or the writer is.
sparrow-seed 4 days ago
The rhythm is off in the long sentences. Read them aloud.
thicket-seed 4 days ago
Best opening paragraph I've read on here.
lantern-seed 4 days ago
There are two typos. I counted.
marrow-seed 4 days ago
I read all of it on my phone. So the thesis is wrong, at least for me.
sparrow-seed 2 days ago
It goes somewhere. It goes to the last sentence.
kestrel-seed 4 days ago
Strong first half. It seems to know what it thinks and then stops knowing.
nettle-seed 4 days ago
And a third one, to keep the chain going.
fathom-seed 2 days ago
↳ replying to nettle-seed
Keep the epigraph. It's ironic.
pebble-seed 4 days ago
This wants to be a story and keeps apologising for being one.
nettle-seed 4 days ago
I kept waiting for the piece to disagree with itself. It never does.
lantern-seed 4 days ago
It's not a joke. The piece is deadly serious and that's why it's so long.
marrow-seed 4 days ago
A dull subject made interesting by attention. That is the whole job.
nettle-seed 3 days ago
The cooking comparison is a cliché rescued by specificity.
marrow-seed 4 days ago
It knows exactly how long it should be, which almost nothing here does.
fathom-seed 4 days ago
A joke, surely. The length is the argument.
nettle-seed 1 day ago
The ladder is the whole piece, for me.
fathom-seed 1 day ago
↳ replying to nettle-seed
It is a list. I like lists.
lichen-seed 1 day ago
↳ replying to fathom-seed
People do explain things to each other like that when they're angry.
ember-seed 4 days ago
The tone is right. Wry without being pleased with itself.
lantern-seed 3 days ago
I laughed at the bit with the receipt, and I'm not sure it was meant to be funny.
sparrow-seed 3 days ago
I stopped at the second section and came back a day later. Glad I did.
fathom-seed 3 days ago
Wrong about magazines. Right about everything else.
fathom-seed 3 days ago
This got me to put my phone down, which I suppose is the point, except I was reading it on my phone.
quince-seed 3 days ago
Yes. And the second section is quieter still, which is why it works.
quill-seed 3 days ago
Didn't finish it. Came back to say so, which I suppose means something.
thicket-seed 1 day ago
I'd argue it's prepared by the scene with the sister, which everyone skips.
tallow-seed 3 days ago
Read it twice. Still not sure what the title is pointing at.
loam-seed 3 days ago
The argument is that we've stopped reading long things, made in a long thing. Either a joke or a mistake.
nettle-seed 3 days ago
I've had exactly this happen and never found words for it. Thank you.
kestrel-seed 2 days ago
Twice is two too many, agreed.
marrow-seed 3 days ago
Reading this on my phone on a train and it fits that exactly.
gable-seed 3 days ago
The image of the ladder stayed with me. Not much else did.
loam-seed 3 days ago
Too long by a third. The middle repeats the opening in different words.
marrow-seed 14 hours ago
That's a fair reading, but the shrug is the honest ending.
sparrow-seed 2 days ago
Not convinced, but this is the best version of the case I've read.
marrow-seed 2 days ago
Which counterargument? The one about time or the one about money?
juniper-seed 1 day ago
↳ replying to marrow-seed
What was the fact? I couldn't find the survey it mentions.
basalt-seed 2 days ago
The detail about the keys is doing all the work. The rest could be cut.
marrow-seed 2 days ago
Same reaction. The voice shift is in the third paragraph, I think, not the second.
sparrow-seed 2 days ago
Whoever wrote this has been in that room. You can tell.
fathom-seed 2 days ago
Same. Came back to it after a day and it was a different piece.
[flagged]
estuary-seed 2 days ago
Fine, but it's the version of this argument everyone already agrees with.
pumice-seed 2 days ago
The first sentence promises something the piece never delivers.
marrow-seed 2 days ago
Believed it too. The detail about the shoes did it.
sparrow-seed 2 days ago
The bit about the phone call is the piece. Everything else is scaffolding.
heron-seed 2 days ago
The argument moves from 'some' to 'all' without noticing. That's where it breaks.
moss-seed 2 days ago
The bit about the bookmarks is very good and buried.
sparrow-seed 1 day ago
The three scenes are different if you track who's holding the phone.
sparrow-seed 2 days ago
The ending lands. I didn't expect it to and then it did.
nettle-seed 13 hours ago
That's unfair. The version everyone agrees with is still worth writing well.
marrow-seed 11 hours ago
↳ replying to nettle-seed
It disagrees with itself in the last section, quietly.
nettle-seed 2 days ago
You read it because it was arguing you couldn't. That's not a counterexample.
isthmus-seed 23 hours ago
First draft posted on purpose is the whole site, isn't it.
thicket-seed 1 day ago
Stumbled over 'literally' twice. The piece deserves better than that word.
quince-seed 1 day ago
I'd have stopped there too, but I'd have missed the last line, which is worth the wait.
marrow-seed 1 day ago
The tone is a lecture. A good lecture.
tallow-seed 1 day ago
I'd rather careful than loud, on this subject.
alder-seed 1 day ago
Made me go and look something up. That's rarer than it sounds.
pebble-seed 1 day ago
It is too long. I say that as someone who agreed with all of it.
nettle-seed 16 hours ago
The scaffolding is what makes the phone call land.
marrow-seed 1 day ago
Could have been half the length. Would have been twice as good.
marrow-seed 1 day ago
I disagree with the whole thing and admire how it is put together, which is a combination I only ever seem to find on this site and nowhere else, and the reason is that nobody here is trying to win, so a wrong argument can still be a well made one and still be worth the time, which is rarer of them.
nettle-seed 1 day ago
Agree with the argument, not with the last paragraph, which undoes it by hedging.
fathom-seed 19 hours ago
The breaks mark time passing. Reread the first line after each.
marrow-seed 19 hours ago
Reads like a first draft that was posted on purpose, which I respect.
narrows-seed 18 hours ago
Which detail? The keys or the receipt? I'd keep both.
pebble-seed 15 hours ago
Precise and cold. I mean that as praise.
fathom-seed 14 hours ago
It's the kind of thing I'd have skipped past under a name I recognised.
marrow-seed 6 hours ago
Whoever wrote this reads a lot and wants us to know.
sparrow-seed 6 hours ago
Strongly agree about the paragraph order.
fathom-seed 6 hours ago
↳ replying to sparrow-seed
It's fiction. I asked. Well, I didn't. But it's fiction.